Dogme 95 logo- Dogme Brotherhood |
Paris, March 1995. The film world is gathered at
the Le cinéma vers son deuxième siècle symposium to celebrate the first
century of cinema and ponder its uncertain fate. Invited to discuss the
possible future of cinema, Danish director Lars von Trier, already widely known
for a series of challenging (and sometimes controversial) feature films,
proposes a practical way forward. He presents a manifesto, accompanied by a
series of rules aiming to free artists from the shackles of mega budgets and
visual excess, a kind of cinematic regression therapy that he - and
co-conspirator Thomas Vinterberg - hope will change the face of cinema.
Throwing stacks of red flyers into the enthusiastic and bewildered audience, They
were later joined by fellow Danish directors Kristian Levring and Soren Kragh-Jacobsen, forming the Dogme 95
Collective or the Dogme Brethren. Dogme is the Danish word
for dogma. Dogme 95
was the word made flesh: The Vow of Chastity its Commandments.
Beginnings: From Festen to
The Idiots
Thomas Vinterberg's Festen (The Celebration, 1998) |
Despite its clear aesthetic
influence on Lars von Trier's 1996 feature Breaking the Waves, the first
certified Dogme film was Thomas Vinterberg's Festen (The Celebration,
1998), which traced a family torn apart by suicide and a startling
revelation. Vinterberg's film won the Jury Prize at the 1998 Cannes Film
Festival, and a whole slate of awards from film critics and festival audiences
across the world.
Before the title sequence the Dogme manifesto certificate is
showed with the number of the film. Central to the plot is the 60th
birthday party of Helge, the father of four children. The eldest son Christian
reveals the dark secrets of his childhood to the assembled guests. With natural
lighting, sound and hand-held video camera Festen
creates disorientating images as disturbing as the content of the story. As the
film is shot with a digital video camera and blown up to 35 mm, the material is
very grainy on the big screen of a cinema theatre (on Video this graininess is
invisible). The aesthetic of the movie resembles the aesthetic of the French
New Wave, as hand-held camera equipment was used extensively. Vinterberg sees
the vow of chastity as liberation from technical considerations and the
limitations as inspiration. But also the collective aspect appeals to him.
Also premiering at Cannes in 1998
was Lars von Trier's first foray into Dogme, Idioterne (The Idiots).
Although markedly less successful than Vinterberg's film, Idioterne
gained noteriety around the world for its frank expressions of sexuality and
crude treatment of intellectual disability.A group of young people, who
live in a large house, pretend in the public to be idiots. They try to find
their 'inner idiot'. By accident Karen gets involved in this group. In the end
it turns out that one of them really had the disease the others were pretending
and the group falls apart. Some serious questions about society's attitude to
the disabled arise when watching the movie. The funny thing is the reactions to
the idiots rather than the idiots themselves. The film is very provocative
because of its sensitive subject. The movie seems to break with the Dogme
rules, as film music appears, but von Trier reveals in an interview that the
source of the music - the harmonica player - was located behind the camera
while shooting. So the sound is always recorded with the image, however tricky
this is to achieve.
The third film of the Dogme movement
came the following year with Danish cohort Søren Kragh-Jacobsen's Mifunes
sidste sang (Mifune's Last Song, 1999), in which a father's death
requires his son to return to the small Danish island of his childhood and care
for his intellectually disabled brother. A hit at festivals and award
ceremonies worldwide, Mifunes sidste sang remains one of Denmark's most
successful box office exports.
The success of Festen and Mifune,
and the notoriety of Idioterne, ensured that Dogme had gained a
worldwide audience. In 1999, the movement spread to France (with Jean-Marc
Barr's Lovers), the USA (Harmony Korine's Julien Donkey-Boy),
Korea (Daniel H. Byun's Interview) and Argentina (Jose Luis Marques' F*ckland),
ensuring that Dogme 95 had become a worldwide phenomenon. Dragging cinema into
the twenty-first century, latter Dogme highlights included Lone Scherfig's Italiensk
for begyndere (Italian for Beginners, 2000) and Susanne Bier's Elsker
dig for evigt (Open Hearts, 2002).
Futures:
After Dogme 95
In the original Dogme 95 manifesto,
Lars von Trier and Thomas Vinterberg referred to the initial promise of the
French Nouvelle Vague, claiming that 'the goal was correct but the means were
not! The new wave proved to be a ripple that washed ashore and turned to muck.'
Of course, over a decade later, the same has been said of Dogme 95. Yet, the
legacy of Dogme 95 is much the same as every other 'new wave' before and since;
once the concrete ideas have become diluted, the strict rules relaxed and the
main protagonists have moved on, we are left with only the films and their influence
on future generations of filmmakers. And, for better or worse, Dogme 95 has
proved to be nothing if not influential.
The Dogme movement was officially announced on March 22, 1995 at Le
Cinéma Vers Son Deuxième Siècle in Paris where the cinema world's elite
gathered to celebrate the first century of motion pictures and
contemplate the uncertain future of commercial cinema. The story goes
that Lars von Trier was supposed to speak about the future of film but
instead he began showering the alarmed audience with red pamphlets
announcing his Dogme 95 movement. Since then 108 films have been
consider "Dogme" worthy, with the first 31 receiving certificates of
approval. Apparently in June, 2002 both creators declared that the
Dogme95 movement was officially dead because it was starting to become a
genre, which was never the intention. Although you can still fill out a
form and send it to someone somewhere and be added to the list of
Dogme95 films, the truest of Dogme95 films are the first 31 certified.
It's hard to measure the impact of Dogme precisely. Many films that might
look as if they've been influenced by what you might call the Dogme style are
actually simply reflecting a lack of budgetary means. But the look did go
mainstream and can be seen in music videos and advertising, most famously in one
batch of ads for Mentos breath fresheners. Most of all, the widely varied forms
of creativity displayed by the first round of Dogme directors using exactly the
same means is definitely an encouragement to any rookie filmmaker with a new DV
camera in hand. Learn more about Dogme 95...
Film movement- French New Way and Dogme 95
Dogme Uncut,Lars von Trier, Thomas Vinterberg, and the Gang That Took on Hollywood
Danish Dogmas: Purity and Provocation: Dogma ’95 edited by Mette Hjort and Scott MacKenzie
Hi, you have provided very good information on directors and films related to Dogme 95.
ReplyDeleteBut I wonder, in Lars von Trier and Thomas Vinterberg's comment on French New Wave about how 'the goal was correct but the means were not', what exactly was wrong in French New Wave films that Dogme 95 can help rectify?
Also, it would be good if you could tell us about the post-war situation and socioeconomical factors in France that contributes to the birth of Dogme 95.
I look forward to your reply. Thanks! =)
When you read articles about Dogme-95, you will always see this slogan-"The goal was correct but the mean was not",actually this is aims of the Nouvelle Vague meantioned by the "PLAYING THE WAVES-LARS VON TRIER'S GAME CINEMA",an Amsterdam Uniiversiity Press,you can download this 256 pages at google.The anti-bourgeois cinema itself became bourgeois, because the foundations upon which its theories were based was the bourgeois perception of art.To DOGME 95 the movie is not illusion,It is about anti-illusionism and its solemn oath ‘to force the truth out of my characters and settings’,as DOGME 95 counters the film of illusion by the presentation of an indisputable set of rules known as THE VOW OF CHASTITY.
ReplyDeleteDogme 95 was a reaction to complex factors both inside and outside of Denmark. One of the possible outside factors was the influence from Hollywood cinema. Statistically, 1995 (when Dogme was founded) was the worst year for Danish cinema in terms of national sales. In this year national film secured only 8 % of the total market in Denmark, while the American film share the same year almost exceeded 81%. Making a Danish movie was not very attractive. In this situation a few of the Danish directors opted to go to Hollywood and make movies there, but others preferred to stay in Denmark and start a new alternative movement. The result was the creation of Dogme 95 as a reaction against mainstream American cinema,we can say that creation of Dogme was a direct outcome of the wider globalisation process.Dogme 95 can be described as identity politics, as an attempt of Danish movie-makers to “fight back” against the influence of globalization, to Hollywood mainstream and to make their country famous by creating a new movement that would at the same time bring out the national identity
ReplyDeleteRob .. from the Howard Stern Show sent me here. He said that his next tattoo was gonna be the "Dogme 95' logo of the Pig with an Eye for an A-Hole. @54:40 in -----<><><><>><><>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kr9BF42YSCo
ReplyDeletehttp://4.bp.blogspot.com/-T5enTEiHdvk/T0hTaD6f6-I/AAAAAAAAABI/9s5DAeFhFtw/s1600/dogme95.jpg
ReplyDelete